Pages

Showing posts with label calories burned. Show all posts
Showing posts with label calories burned. Show all posts

Friday, 11 January 2013

Why the weight is so hard to shift: guidelines have been wrong all along

reposted from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/feb/21/weight-loss-guidelines-wrong-vancouver
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.



National guidelines that advise people how to lose weight are seriously flawed and grossly overstate how quickly they will reach their targets, scientists say.

Researchers found people lost only half as much weight as expected in a year if they followed the advice given by the NHS and US health organisation.

Check out this online calculator.


The rule of thumb used by the NHS and other health services assumes that if a person cuts 500 calories from their daily diet, they will lose about 450g (1lb) each week, regardless of how long they adhered to the regime.

But as people lose weight, their metabolism slows until they reach a new stable bodyweight. Their weight loss is further complicated by how much body fat and muscle they have when they start dieting.

"Dietitians and physicians have used this rule of thumb for a long time, but it turns out to be completely wrong. It doesn't account for metabolic changes that happen when people change diet," said Kevin Hall, who led the research.

"If you change calories, your metabolism slows down and eventually you reach a plateau."

He told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science: "If you want to lose 10lb of weight eventually, you need to cut 100 calories a day from your diet. You will get halfway there in a year, but then plateau after three years. The old rule of thumb predicts twice as much weight loss after a year and gets worse after that." I DON'T UNDERSTAND!

The glitch has consequences that go far beyond the frustration of obese and overweight people who are trying to shed weight. Public policies drawn up to tackle the rising obesity epidemic have to be reassessed, Hall said, and in cases where this has been done, their effectiveness looked much less impressive than before.

....

Based on the work, Hall and his colleagues have created an online tool that people from adolescence to late middle age can use to get more accurate advice on how to lose weight. The tool, which can be used by GPs and patients, then works out how many calories they need to cut, either through dieting or more exercise, and how they can then maintain the healthier weight.

Rather than demoralising people, Hall hopes more accurate advice would help overweight and obese people have realistic expectations.

"If you expected to lose twice as much weight after a year than you actually lose, I think that's horribly demotivating for people. I would rather have realistic figures out there for people to gauge their expectations and gauge their interventions," he said.

...

Hall said they provided "a good reality check for how long weight loss takes, and what changes in eating and exercise are required to achieve and maintain a goal weight."

A Department of Health spokesman said: "We do not give specific recommendations on how much people should eat while dieting as this will be different for each of us. Anyone who wants specific advice should speak to a health professional. We keep all international evidence under review."

Sunday, 12 October 2008

HOW MANY CALORIES ARE YOU REALLY BURNING?

reposted from: http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-242-304-311-8402-0,00.html

If you think running and walking both torch the same number of calories per mile, you better put down that cookie/biscuit.

By Amby Burfoot

PUBLISHED 07/18/2005

... Walking and running are far and away the leading forms of human movement. Every able-bodied human learns how to walk and run without any particular instruction. The same cannot be said of activities such as swimming, bicycling, skateboarding, and hitting a 3-iron. This is why walking and running are the best ways to get in shape, burn extra calories, and improve your health.

Most runners have heard that running burns about 100 calories a mile. "When you perform a continuous exercise, you burn five calories for every liter of oxygen you consume and running in general consumes a lot more oxygen than walking."

What the Numbers Show

In "Energy Expenditure of Walking and Running," published last December in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, a group of Syracuse University researchers measured the actual calorie burn of 12 men and 12 women while running and walking 1,600 meters (roughly a mile) on a treadmill. Result: The men burned an average of 124 calories while running, and just 88 while walking; the women burned 105 and 74. (The men burned more than the women because they weighed more.)

... When you walk, you keep your legs mostly straight, and your center of gravity rides along fairly smoothly on top of your legs. In running, we actually jump from one foot to the other. Each jump raises our center of gravity when we take off, and lowers it when we land, since we bend the knee to absorb the shock. This continual rise and fall of our weight requires a tremendous amount of Newtonian force (fighting gravity) on both takeoff and landing.

Now that you understand why running burns 50 percent more calories per mile than walking, I hate to tell you that it's a mostly useless number. Sorry. We mislead ourselves when we talk about the total calorie burn (TCB) of exercise rather than the net calorie burn (NCB). To figure the NCB of any activity, you must subtract the resting metabolic calories your body would have burned, during the time of the workout, even if you had never gotten off the sofa.

the relative NCB of running a mile in 9:30 versus walking the same mile in 19:00. Their male subjects burned 105 calories running, 52 walking; the women, 91 and 43. That is, running burns twice as many net calories per mile as walking. And

since you can run two miles in the time it takes to walk one mile, running burns four times as many net calories per hour as walking.

I had read years ago that fast walking burns more calories than running at the same speed. Now was the time to test this hypothesis. Wearing a heart-rate monitor, I ran on a treadmill for two minutes at 3.0 mph (20 minutes per mile), and at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 mph (10:55 per mile). After a 10-minute rest to allow my heart rate to return to normal, I repeated the same thing walking. Here's my running vs. walking heart rate at the end of each two-minute stint: 3.0 (99/81), 3.5 (104/85), 4.0 (109/94), 4.5 (114/107), 5.0 (120/126), 5.5 (122/145). My conclusion: Running is harder than walking at paces slower than 12-minutes-per-mile. At faster paces, walking is harder than running.

How to explain this? It's not easy, except to say that walking at very fast speeds forces your body to move in ways it wasn't designed to move. This creates a great deal of internal "friction" and inefficiency, which boosts heart rate, oxygen consumption, and calorie burn. So, as Jon Stewart might say, "Walking fast...good. Walking slow...uh, not so much."

The bottom line: Running is a phenomenal calorie-burning exercise. In public-health terms--that is, in the fight against obesity--it's even more important that running is a low-cost, easy-to-do, year-round activity. Walking doesn't burn as many calories, but it remains a terrific exercise. As David Swain says, "The new research doesn't mean that walking burns any fewer calories than it used to. It just means that walkers might have to walk a little more, or eat a little less, to hit their weight goal."

What's the Burn? A Calorie Calculator
You can use the formulas below to determine your calorie-burn while running and walking. The "Net Calorie Burn" measures calories burned, minus basal metabolism. Scientists consider this the best way to evaluate the actual calorie-burn of any exercise. The walking formulas apply to speeds of 3 to 4 mph. At 5 mph and faster, walking burns more calories than running.

Your Total Calorie Burn/Mile
Your Net Calorie Burn/Mile
Running
.75 x your weight (in lbs.)
.63 x your weight
Walking
.53 x your weight

.30 x your weight

Adapted from "Energy Expenditure of Walking and Running," Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, Cameron et al, Dec. 2004.

Example: total Calorie burn / mile
169 pounds weight
Running 0.75 x 169 = 126 cals; at 4mph = 507 cals
Running - basal metabolic rate = 0.63 x 169 = 106 cals; at 4mph = 425
Basal Metabolic rate: 507 - 425 = 82 cals.

This equates to my previous calculations.

Monday, 7 January 2008

Calculate calories burned by exercise

reposted from:
http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/magazine/interactive/calories/

Example:
Activity Time Calories
Cycling 30 minutes 355
Walking 30 minutes 178
  • Total minutes: 60
  • Total calories: 533

450-549 calories:

What have I burnt off? 1 tuna mayonnaise baguette, or half a pepperoni pizza.