Pages

Showing posts with label CVD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CVD. Show all posts

Sunday, 30 December 2012

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Charts

reposted from: http://heartuk.org.uk/health-professionals/resources/risk-charts
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.


Risk charts

How to use the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Charts* for Primary Prevention

These charts are for estimating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI] and stroke, coronary and stroke death and new angina pectoris) for individuals who have not already developed coronary heart disease (CHD) or other major atherosclerotic disease. They are an aid to making clinical decisions about how intensively to intervene on lifestyle and whether to use antihypertensive, lipid lowering medication and aspirin. The use of these charts is not appropriate for the following patients groups.

  • Those with: CHD or other major atherosclerotic disease 
  • Familial hypercholesterolaemia or other inherited dyslipidaemias 
  • Chronic renal dysfunction 
  • Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus





The charts should not be used to decide whether to introduce antihypertensive medication when blood pressure (BP) is persistently at or above 160/100 or when target organ damage (TOD) due to hypertension is present. In both cases antihypertensive medication is recommended regardless of CVD risk.

Similarly the charts should not be used to decide whether to introduce lipid-lowering medication when the ratio of serum total to high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol exceeds 7. Such medication is generally then indicated regardless of estimated CVD risk.

To estimate an individual’s absolute 10 year risk of developing CVD choose the table for his or her gender, smoking status (smoker/non-smoker) and age. Within this square define the level of risk according to the point where the coordinates for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol meet. If no HDL cholesterol result is available, then assume this is 1.00mmol/l and the lipid scale can be used for total serum cholesterol alone.

Higher risk individuals (red areas) are defined as those whose 10 year CVD risk exceeds 20%, which is approximately equivalent to the CHD risk of >15% over the same period indicated by the previous version of these charts. As a minimum those at highest CVD risk (greater than 30% shown by the line within the red area) should be targeted and treated now. When resources allow, others with a CVD risk of >20% should be progressively targeted.

The chart also assists in the identification of individuals whose 10 year CVD risk moderately increased in the range 10-20% (orange area) and those in whom risk is lower than 10% over 10 years (green area).

Smoking status should reflect lifetime exposure to tobacco and not simply tobacco use at the time of assessment. For example, those who have given up smoking within 5 years should be regarded as current smokers for the purposes of the charts.

The initial BP and the first random (non-fasting) total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol can be used to estimate an individual’s risk. However, the decision on using drug therapy should generally be based on repeat risk factor measurements over a period of time.

Men and women do not reach the level of risk predicted by the charts for the three age bands until they reach the ages 49, 59, and 69 years respectively. Everyone aged 70 years and over should be considered at higher risk. The charts will overestimate current risk most in the under forties. Clinical judgement must be exercised in deciding on treatment in younger patients. However, it should be recognised that BP and cholesterol tend to rise most and HDL cholesterol to decline most in younger people already possessing adverse levels. Thus untreated, their risk at the age 49 years is likely to be higher than the projected risk shown on the age-less-than 50 years chart.

These charts (and all other currently available methods of CVD risk prediction) are based on groups of people with untreated levels of BP, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol. In patients already receiving antihypertensive therapy in whom the decision is to be made about whether to introduce lipid-lowering medication or vice versa the charts can act as a guide, but unless recent pre-treatment risk factor values are available it is generally safest to assume that CVD risk is higher than that predicted by current levels of BP or lipids on treatment.

CVD risk is also higher than indicated in the charts for:-

  • Those with a family history of premature CVD or stroke (male first degree relatives aged <55 years and female first degree relatives aged <65 years) which increases the risk by a factor of approximately 1.5 
  • Those with raised triglyceride levels 
  • Women with premature menopause 
  • Those who are not yet diabetic, but have impaired fasting glucose (6.1-6.9mmol/l) 
  • In some ethnic minorities the risk charts underestimate CVD risk, because they have not been validated in these populations. For example, in people originating from the Indian subcontinent it is safest to assume that the CVD risk is higher than predicted from the charts (1.5 times). 
  • The charts may be used to illustrate the direction of impact of risk factor intervention on estimated level of CVD risk. However, such estimates are crude and are not based on randomised trial evidence. Nevertheless, this approach maybe helpful in motivating appropriate intervention. 
  • The charts are primarily to assist in directing intervention to those who typically stand to benefit most. 

*Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Chart reproduced with permission from The University of Manchester Department of Medical Illustration, Manchester Infirmary.


Saturday, 26 June 2010

The European cardiovascular disease risk assessment model


Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE): High & Low cardiovascular Risk Charts based on gender, age, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and smoking status, with relative risk chart, qualifiers and instructions

SCORE risk charts for high risk countries (incl. UK): pdf

Wednesday, 23 June 2010

NICE review of cost effectiveness of Statins


2006 review by NICE includes trial data, benefits and cost effectiveness of statins in preventing CVD

NICE recommendations on how to reduce CVD (Cardiovascular disease)

reposted from: NHS Choices


Protect the population from the harmful effects of trans fats
  • Eliminate the use of industrially produced trans fatty acids (IPTFAs) for human consumption.
  • In line with other EU countries (specifically Denmark and Austria), introduce legislation to ensure that IPTFA levels do not exceed 2% in the fats and oils used in food manufacturing and cooking.
  • Establish guidelines for local authorities to independently monitor IPTFA levels in the restaurant, fast-food and home food trades using existing statutory powers (in relation to trading standards or environmental health)

Does this guidance apply to me?

This guidance is aimed at improving the health of the population as a whole. It makes recommendations to people who can make changes to improve population health.
However, the principles underlying the recommendations also apply to individuals. For example, most people should reduce their salt, saturated fat and trans fat intake, as well as increasing their levels of physical activity.
Related NICE guidance focuses more on individuals, including guidance on stopping and preventing smoking and tobacco control, physical activity, obesity, high blood pressure and mother and child nutrition.

Links To The Headlines

Slash salt to 'prevent thousands of deaths. Daily Express, June 22 2010
Plea to stop using trans-fats. Financial Times, June 22 2010
5-point plan to save 40,000 lives. Daily Mirror, June 22 2010

Links To Science




Friday, 24 October 2008

Mortality Circulatory diseases - leading cause group


Focus on Health

Age-standardised mortality rates for selected broad disease groups, 1911-2003, England & Wales
Age-standardised mortality rates for selected broad disease groups, 1911-2003, England & Wales

Circulatory diseases (which include heart disease and stroke) have remained the most common cause of death in England and Wales over the last 90 years among both males and females, with the exception of 1918 to 1919. The chart presents the four disease groups which have each at some time during the last 90 years been among the three disease groups with the highest mortality rates.

Male death rates from circulatory disease are higher than those for females: 300 per 100,000 males and 190 per 100,000 females in 2003. Within these, death rates from heart disease were higher than stroke among both males and females.

Cancers are now the second most common cause of death among males and females. Female cancer mortality rates decreased during the 1940s and 1950s, then rose to a peak in the late 1980s, declining again during the 1990s. Among males the pattern was different. Rates increased substantially to the late 1970s and then declined more rapidly from the 1990s.

Death rates for infectious and respiratory diseases declined in the first half of the 20th Century, although the 1918-19 influenza pandemic claimed the lives of 152,000 people in England and Wales alone and 20 to 50 million people worldwide. In the last 50 years death rates from circulatory diseases decreased more rapidly.

Selected causes of death: by sex and age, 2003
Selected causes of death: by sex and age, 2003

Mortality rates by cause of death vary with age and sex. In 2003, for young people aged 15 to 29, mortality rates were highest for injury and poisoning (40 per 100,000 population for men and 10 per 100,000 for women).

In adults aged 30 to 44, the major cause of death differed for men and women. Injury and poisoning was the leading cause of death for men (43 per 100,000 population) and cancers the leading cause of death for women (30 per 100,000 population).

For those aged 45 to 64, cancers were the leading cause of death among both men and women, with mortality rates of 240 per 100,000 for men and 213 per 100,000 for women. Injury mortality rates among men aged 45 to 64 were lower than for those aged 15 to 29 and 30 to 44.

In older people aged 65 to 84, circulatory diseases were the leading cause of death, for both men and women, although rates for all the causes shown in the table were higher than those at younger ages. The highest mortality rates were in people aged 85 and over, with circulatory diseases having the highest rates followed by respiratory diseases and cancers.
Source: Office for National Statistics

Notes:
View the latest mortality data.

Notes & definitions
Published on 17 January 2006 at 9:30 am

Tuesday, 7 October 2008

European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary




reposted from: http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/28/19/2375#top

In general, a middle aged person with a 10-year risk of CVD death of 5% or more is regarded as at high risk. Examination of the FINRISK MONICA data (which contribute substantially to the SCORE high risk population charts) suggests that the equivalent total (fatal + non-fatal) CVD risk is about 10%.

In my experience, some charts in the 2003 ESC study confused risk of CVD death with non fatal CVD risk. "The choice of CVD mortality rather than total (fatal + non-fatal) events was deliberate although not universally popular. Non-fatal event rates are critically dependent upon definitions and the methods used in their ascertainment. " (see section)

Calculating total event rates from FINRISK suggests that, at the level (5%) at which risk management advice is likely to be intensified, total event risk is about 10%.