Pages

Showing posts with label NICE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NICE. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 July 2014

'More adults should be taking statins,' says NICE

reposted from: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2014/07July/Pages/More-adults-should-be-taking-statins-says-NICE.aspx
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Reading the peer-reviewed literature on statins and other reports, I've suspected, for more than a year, that this advice (20mg/day Atorvastatin if QRISK2 10-year risk of CVD is 10% or more) would  be recommended by NICE.

"Doctors have been told to offer cholesterol-lowering statins to millions more people," BBC News reports.
New guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommend lowering the bar for statin use in adults at risk of heart disease. 
NICE suggests up to 8,000 lives could be saved every three years if everyone with a 10% risk of developing cardiovascular disease within the next 10 years is offered one of the widely used cholesterol-lowering medications.
Cardiovascular diseases are diseases affecting the heart and blood vessels, such as heart disease and stroke.
NICE says the evidence clearly shows statins are safe and effective and would be a good use of healthcare resources if given to these people.
The announcement has been met with a variable response, with the Daily Mail saying up to half of all adults could now be eligible for the drugs, and that, "GPs warn of chaos" at being "told to trawl medical records to find at-risk patients".
On the other side of the argument, Professor Baker, director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE, says the new recommendations would not create an additional workload for GPs.
On the NICE website, he said: "Most patients will already be under surveillance by their GPs, so this won't add any additional workload. But you can do the QRISK2 risk assessment yourself. It can be done online or via an app, so it doesn't need to be done by the GP."
You can assess your own risk online using a risk assessment tool based on factors such as smoking history, body mass index (BMI) and family history of heart disease.
The NICE guidelines have now been published, which means they will come into effect in the NHS in England. However, NICE still recommends preventable lifestyle measures, such as losing weight or stopping smoking, are addressed first before starting statin treatment.
Ultimately, the decision to take a statin – even if it is recommended – will always remain a choice that sits with the patient.

Statins and reporting bias

Visit any medical news forum or comment board, such as the Mail Online's health section, and search for statins, and you will see stories of statins causing terrible side effects – for example, how statins left a person "crippled with pain and brain fog".

While the issue of side effects should never be ignored, the bad press statins get online could be an example of reporting bias in action – where there is selective reporting (or suppression) of information.

In other words, people who tolerated statins poorly are more likely to report that fact than people who have been taking them for years with no adverse effects. Similarly, most UK newspapers are unlikely to run an "I took statins, I had no side effects, and they probably prevented a heart attack" story. Good news rarely shifts newspapers or gets clicks on websites.

What are statins?

Statins are usually the first medication of choice to reduce the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL, or "bad")cholesterol in the blood.
Cholesterol and other fatty substances can build up and clog the arteries in the heart and elsewhere in the body, leading to cardiovascular diseases. Reducing cholesterol levels helps reduce the risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack or stroke.
Examples of statin drugs aresimvastatin and atorvastatin, which come as tablets. The recommended treatment course is to usually take a tablet once a day for life.

What is NICE recommending?

NICE has published an update to its previous clinical guideline on the cardiovascular risk assessment and management of lipids (fats in the blood, which includes cholesterol and triglycerides) in people who either already have cardiovascular disease (such as those who've had a heart attack or stroke), or people who are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
The main new recommendations are that:
  • A systematic strategy should be used in general practice to identify people who are likely to be at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD).
  • People should be prioritised for a full risk assessment if their estimated 10-year risk of CVD is 10% or more (using the QRISK2 assessment tool).
  • Before starting lipid-lowering medications for the prevention of CVD, at least one blood sample should be taken to measure total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL, or "good") cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations.
  • In people who have a 10% or greater risk of developing CVD within the next 10 years, the recommended statin to start treatment with is atorvastatin, given at a dose of 20mg daily.
  • In people who already have established CVD (people who have heart disease or have had a stroke), the recommended starting dose of atorvastatin is 80mg daily (unless there are side effects or other contraindications).
For people at risk of developing CVD within the next 10 years, the recommendations to start 20mg atorvastatin applies to adults of all ages, including people over the age of 85 years (in very elderly people, statins may reduce the risk of a non-fatal heart attack). This advice stands unless there are other health-related factors that make statin treatment inappropriate.
NICE does make several important provisions around decisions to start treatment for the prevention of CVD in people considered to be at risk.
These are outlined below.

Patient-doctor discussion

The decision whether to start a statin should be made after an informed discussion between the doctor and patient about the risks and benefits of treatment, taking into account factors such as:
  • possible benefits from lifestyle modifications (measures that could be tried first before starting a statin, such as exercising more, eating a healthier diet and stopping smoking)
  • patient preference
  • other medical illnesses
  • the problems of adding another tablet if the person is already taking a lot of daily medications
  • general frailty and life expectancy

Lifestyle changes

Before starting statin treatment, assessment should be made into other health and lifestyle factors that may need management, including:
  • smoking and alcohol consumption
  • blood pressure
  • BMI
  • diabetes
  • kidney or liver disease
The benefits of optimising all other modifiable lifestyle risk factors (for example, overweight/obesity or smoking) should be discussed, and people offered support for this if needed, such as exercise referral programmes.
Statin treatment may then be considered if lifestyle modifications don't work.

What is the rationale for lowering the threshold for the drugs?

Currently, one-third of deaths in the UK are caused by cardiovascular disease, accounting for around 180,000 deaths each year.
Cardiovascular disease is well known to have a significant burden of disability. It is believed £8 billion of healthcare resources are tied up in the disease.
Professor Mark Baker, director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE, says: "Doctors have been giving statins to 'well people' since NICE first produced guidance on this in 2006. We are now recommending the threshold is reduced further.
"The overwhelming body of evidence supports their use, even in people at low risk of CVD. The effectiveness of these medicines is now well proven and their cost has fallen. The weight of evidence clearly shows statins are safe and cost effective for use in people with a 10% risk of CVD over 10 years."
Dr Anthony Wierzbicki, from Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, and chair of the Guideline Development Group, also commented on the new guidance: "We've been able to simplify the guideline so it's now much easier for patients to be assessed and for GPs and nurses to make sense of the results. There is greater clarity, a simpler framework, and a systematic way of identifying people who could benefit from treatment.
"We've got the best evidence base, huge numbers, and the biggest set of clinical trials ever done. Other areas of medicine would give their teeth for this evidence, it's that good. Statins work, they are very cheap, and are becoming considerably cheaper as they come off-patent, which, in a cost-limited health service, is a big consideration.
"That enables us to actually say that we should treat people with heart disease a lot more intensively because we know that will prevent further events. In people with diabetes or kidney disease, giving a statin will reduce heart attacks and strokes. For people at risk of heart disease, if lifestyle measures fail, we have a second option of giving them a statin if they want and require it."

Are there any risks or side effects with statins?

Statins are fairly safe drugs, though there are a range of possible side effects and groups of people who should use them with caution. This includes people with an underactive thyroid, kidney disease and liver disease. Women should also not take statins while pregnant or breastfeeding.
Possible side effects include headaches and dizziness, sleep disturbances, fatigue, tummy disturbances, altered sensation, and sensitivity reactions such as rash or itching.
Very rarely, statins have been associated with the risk of having a toxic effect on the muscles, causing muscle pain and weakness, and even a serious condition called rhabdomyolysis, where the muscle fibres start to break down.
However, the risks and benefits would be discussed and taken into account for any individual before a statin is prescribed, including their personal and family medical history.

How has the announcement been received by the media?

As the BBC News headline indicates, NICE's decision has been met with controversy. 
Professor Mark Baker, the director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE is quoted as saying: "Prevention is better than cure. One of the mainstays of modern medicine is to use treatments to prevent bad things happening in the future. It's why we use vaccines and immunisation to prevent infectious disease, it's why we use drugs to lower blood pressure to prevent heart attacks, strokes, and kidney disease, and it's why we're using statins now."
Meanwhile, in opposing camps there is debate about "medicalising" a nation and encouraging people to just pop a pill rather than following a healthy lifestyle.
The British Medical Association's General Practitioner Committee is quoted as saying: "There is insufficient evidence of significant overall benefit to low-risk individuals to allow GPs to have confidence in the recommendation. The measure would distort health spending priorities and disadvantage other patients."
However, as quoted in the Daily Mail, Professor Baker responded: "It is ludicrous to suggest that we are overmedicalising the population when the whole point of using modern, safe and effective drugs in an economic way is to prevent bad things happening in the future."
Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the British Medical Association's GP committee, feels NICE has not taken into account the additional pressures they'll be placing on GPs. "In making their decision, NICE has failed to take the current pressures on general practice into account, and the further impact this will have on already overstretched GPs and those patients requiring treatment for other illnesses."
Despite the extensive debate and opposition, as BBC News also highlights, the 10% threshold for statin treatment is comparable to that already used in other European countries.
As the president of the Academy of Medical Sciences, Professor Sir John Tooke, points out on the BBC News website: "Whether or not someone takes drugs to diminish their risk is a matter of personal choice, but it must be informed by accurate information on the balance of risk and benefit in their particular case. The weight of evidence suggests statins are effective, affordable and have an acceptable risk-benefit profile."

Conclusion

Despite somewhat hysterical media coverage to the contrary ("millions more to be given statins," according to the Daily Express), nobody will be forced to take statins.
If your GP does recommend statins, you should ask them to explain the benefits and risks for you personally of starting statin treatment. You may want to find out more about statins before making up your mind – the NHS Choices Health A-Z information on statins is a good place to start.
If you do experience troublesome side effects while taking statins, contact your GP or the doctor in charge of your care. It could be the case that adjusting your dosage or switching to a different type of statin could help relieve any side effects.
Analysis by Bazian. Edited by NHS ChoicesFollow Behind the Headlines on TwitterJoin the Healthy Evidence forum.

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Lipid Modification - NICE draft guidelines 2014

reposted from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=folder&o=66546

Consultation documents

The full version describes the evidence and views that have been considered, and sets out the provisional recommendations that have been developed. My recommended read.
The NICE version presents the provisional recommendations only with some brief supporting information. My recommended read.
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Calculate risk of having a heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years - use QRISK2

It takes seconds to calculate your risk: http://www.qrisk.org

New draft NICE guidelines may be ratified July 2014 recommending use of Statins if your risk of having a heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years is 10% (cf. currently 20%).

See the great interactive 'how statins work'. viz

  1. Cholesterol is produced mainly in the liver. There is good cholesterol and bad cholesterol. Too much bad, LDL-cholesterol, however, can cause hardening of the arteries. 
  2. The liver contains an enzyme called HMG-CoA reductase, which produces cholesterol ...
  3. Statins replace the HMG-CoA that exists in the liver, thereby slowing down the cholesterol production process ...
  4. The 'inhibition' of HMG-CoA enzyme by the statin has other effects, on top of reducing the amount of cholesterol produced. It also increases the production of LDL receptors, proteins which 'catch' the bad cholesterol and draw it into the liver cells to be broken down.
Modified by Chris Street from Guardian Feb 2014 http: //goo.gl/DRAo2R

Whilst NICE and Rory Collins are recommending use of Statins with 10% 10 year risk of heart attack or stroke, John Abramson, a clinician working at Harvard medical school claims his BMJ published analysis showed statins did not significantly reduce mortality in the 20% or 10% risk groups. (Guardian Feb 2014).

Friday, 7 March 2014

Statins for practically everyone over 60?

I quote directly Fergus Walsh from his post ' A nation of pill poppers' from his column dated 12th February 2014:-
"A sensible step that will cut deaths and disability or a mistake that will medicalise millions? 
There are starkly opposing views of proposals from the health watchdog the National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to dramatically increase the numbers offered statins. 
They are already the most commonly prescribed medicines in the UK, which work by lowering the level of cholesterol in blood. Around seven million people are on the tablets which cost less than 10p a day. It is estimated they prevent around 7,000 deaths a year from heart attacks or strokes. Add to that the tens of thousands of people who are saved from disabling non-fatal attacks and you can see why health experts are keen on statins. 
A generation ago cardiovascular disease was common in early middle age. As a result of statins and treatments for reducing blood pressure, the condition has been delayed by around 20 years. 
That means two decades more of healthy life for millions of people. 
QRISK2
The current guidance from NICE says adults with at least a 20% chance of having a heart attack or stroke in the next 10 years should be offered statins. 
That is being lowered to a 10% chance of cardiovascular disease over 10 years. 
So how is the risk calculated? You can work out your individual risk by going online to the QRISK2 calculator
Input factors like your age, sex (men are at greater risk), ethnicity, blood pressure, Body Mass Index, family history, cholesterol level and so on. 
It also includes your postcode: heart disease is strongly linked to poverty and deprivation so that will alter your risk too (though clearly you would expect your doctor to take account of your background, rather than just relying on your address). 
My risk was well below the 10% trigger for statins. But any smug feeling was quickly despatched when I added a decade to my age. 
Once you hit your sixties you can virtually guarantee that your 10-year risk will place you in the statins category no matter how healthy you are. 
The effect of the proposals - which have gone out for consultation in England - would be to add millions to the numbers already on statins. 
Mark Baker, from NICE, who helped draw up the guidelines said: "You'd probably need to treat about 60 people with statins for 10 years to prevent one heart attack or stroke." 
That might not sound like it is worth it, but let's say you treated another six million people, that would prevent 100,000 heart attacks or strokes over a decade. 
Diet & exercise
Estimating the health benefits of statins is difficult, and those figures could be an over-estimate. But you can see that - taken over an entire adult population - the potential health benefits are enormous. 
So that's the argument in favour. Now the opposite view.
Putting people onto statins is akin to medicalising them for life. Rather than taking a pill to lower cholesterol, the same effect can be achieved through changing their diet and exercise levels.
Even small modifications to lifestyle - taking the stairs or getting off the bus one stop further from your destination - can make positive changes. 
Offering sedentary patients a quick fix may simply store up problems for later.
"It's a very bad idea", said Dr Aseem Malhotra a London cardiologist. "Eighty per cent of cardiovascular disease is due to lifestyle and NICE should be concentrating on that aspect rather than offering pills to millions." 
Dr Malhotra believes up to one in five people on statins will suffer side effects such as muscle pains, stomach pains or increased risk of diabetes. 
NICE says the figure is far lower and serious problems with statins are rare. NHS Choices says "statins are generally well tolerated and most people will not experience any side effects." It lists the range of possible adverse reactions. 
Ultimately it will be up to patients to decide, following consultation with their GP. One likely option for many will be to try statins and see whether they trigger any ill-effects. 
Statins are saving lives and preventing disability every day. So they are a powerful tool in promoting good health. But people will need to consider carefully before deciding to take a daily pill for decades to come."
reposted from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-26152492
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Saturday, 15 February 2014

Lipid modification : Cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. NICE guideline: Draft for consultation, February 2014

reposted from: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13637/66552/66552.pdf

(NB. full guidance: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13637/66547/66547.pdf (not reviewed here))

My Key points (my highlights):-

  • [1.3.16] Offer atorvastatin 20 mg for the primary prevention of CVD. [new 2014] 
  • Use the QRISK2 risk assessment tool to assess CVD risk for the primary prevention of CVD. [new 2014] 
  • Prioritise people for a full formal risk assessment if their estimated 10-year risk of CVD is 10% or more. [2008, amended 2014] 
  • Use the QRISK2 risk assessment tool to assess CVD risk for the primary prevention of CVD. [new 2014] 
  • Further information and advice on healthy cooking methods can be found at NHS Choices. [new 2014] 
  • Before starting lipid modification therapy for the primary prevention of CVD, take at least 1 lipid sample to measure a full lipid profile. This should include measurement of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations. A fasting sample is not needed. [new 2014] 
  • Use the clinical findings, lipid profile and family history to judge the likelihood of a familial lipid disorder rather than the use of strict lipid cut-off values alone. [new 2014] 
  • In this update the Guideline Development Group (GDG) recommend the use of non-high density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol rather than low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. LDL cholesterol is not directly measured but requires a calculation using a fasting sample and for triglyceride levels to be less than 4.5 mmol/litre, whereas the measurement of non-HDL does not. 
  • Follow-up of people initiated on statin treatment 
  • 1.3.29 Measure cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol in people who have been started on high-intensity statin treatment after 3 months of treatment and aim for a greater than 40% reduction in non-HDL cholesterol. If a greater than 40% reduction in non-HDL cholesterol is not achieved: 
    • discuss adherence and timing of dose (take at night) 
    • optimise adherence to diet and lifestyle measures 
    • consider increasing dose if started on less than atorvastatin 80 mg and person is judged to be at higher risk because of comorbidities, risk score or using clinical judgement. [new 2014] 
  • 1.3.38 Before offering a statin, ask the person if they have had persistent generalised unexplained muscle pain, whether associated or not with previous lipid-lowering therapy, and if present, measure creatine kinase levels. If these are elevated start statin treatment at a lower dose. [new 2014]
  • 1.3.42 Measure baseline liver transaminase enzymes (alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase) before starting a statin. Measure liver transaminase (alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase) within 3 months of starting treatment and at 12 months, but not again unless clinically indicated. [2008, amended 2014] 
  • 1.3.50 Tell people that there is no evidence that omega-3 fatty acid compounds help to prevent CVD. [new 2014] 
  • Combination therapy for preventing CVD 
    • 1.3.51 Do not offer the combination of a bile acid sequestrant (anion exchange resin), fibrate, nicotinic acid or omega-3 fatty acid compound with a statin for the prevention of CVD. [new 2014] 
  • Appendix B: Grouping of statins 
For the purpose of this guideline, statins are grouped into 3 different intensity categories according to the percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (see table 1). This grouping was agreed by GDG consensus, informed by analyses in the literature. See the full guideline for a discussion of this grouping. 


Reference

Crabsallover Change in Statin Use

Switch from Simvastin 10mg/day = 27% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, where low intensity = 20%-30%, to Atorvastatin 20mg/day = 43% high intensity (>40%). NB. Medium intensity (31%-40%)

NICE publishes new draft guidelines on statins use

crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

"Millions more people should be put on cholesterol-lowering statin drugs," BBC News reports. Draft guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended that the drugs should be given to people with an estimated 1 in 10 or more risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which includes conditions such as heart disease and stroke.

At present, guidance for doctors on using statins to prevent CVD says that only people with a 20% or greater risk of developing CVD in the next 10 years should be offered the drugs.

NICE recommends that a specific statin called atorvastatin is used for both the prevention and treatment of CVD.

How is CVD risk assessed?

NICE recommends a risk assessment tool called QRISK2. This involves a series of calculations based on the following factors:

  • age
  • sex
  • body mass index (BMI)
  • ethnicity
  • family history of heart disease
  • whether you have one or more of the following chronic diseases: diabetes, kidney disease, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation or rheumatoid arthritis
  • blood cholesterol levels
  • your current blood pressure

Doctors should offer "high-intensity" treatment with statins to healthy people who have a 10% or greater 10-year risk of developing CVD. "High-intensity" statins produce the largest LDL reduction at the lowest doses.

Healthy patients at risk of CVD should be offered 20mg of a drug called atorvastatin to cut the risk of CVD. In the previous guidelines, therapy was started using 40mg of a drug called simvastatin. Atorvastatin is a high-intensity drug, while simvastatin is medium intensity.

Where do the draft guidelines come from?
The updated draft guidelines have been published by NICE, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. They are a draft update of the guidelines on lowering cholesterol (or lipid modification) that were published in 2008.
These are draft guidelines that have been published for consultation with professional and government organisations, patient and carer groups, and companies. These stakeholders have until March 26 2014 to comment before NICE decides on its final recommendations.
Anyone who wishes to comment on the guidelines must first register as a stakeholder. To find out more, visit the NICE consultation page.

What is the rationale behind the new recommendations?
The recommended changes have been made on the basis of cost effectiveness. For example, NICE concluded that high-intensity treatment with 20mg atorvastatin is more cost effective than statin treatment using medium-intensity simvastatin.
It also reports that medium-intensity treatment is more cost effective compared with no treatment or low-intensity treatment at all realistic risk levels.
The guideline group decided to change the threshold from 20% risk to 10% risk by taking into account "the uncertainty regarding the frequency of adverse events in routine clinical practice, which may be higher than in clinical trials, the uncertainty around the magnitude of the effectiveness of statins and the accuracy of the QRISK2 tool itself, as well as the base case cost effectiveness results and sensitivity analyses".
The drugs have become cheaper in recent years, and their effectiveness is well proven, NICE notes.

The organisation has also pointed out that although death rates from CVD have halved since the 1970s and 1980s, CVD is the cause of one in three deaths in the UK. At present, as many as seven million people in the UK are believed to be on statins, at an estimated annual cost of £450 million.

What are the risks of taking statins?
Statins can have side effects, although the most common ones, while a nuisance, are not serious. They include stomach upset, headache and insomnia. Occasionally, the drugs can cause inflammation and damage to the muscles. Serious side effects, such as jaundice and visual disturbance, are rare.
Statins are not suitable for everyone. For example, they should not be taken if you have severe liver disease or blood tests suggest your liver may not be working properly.
Read more about the side effects of statins.

What can I do to cut the risk of CVD?
As NICE makes clear, statins are not the only option for treating high cholesterol. Alternative treatments include eating a healthy diet that is low in saturated fats, increasing the amount of omega-3 fatty acids in your diet, and other prescribed medications.
Professor Mark Baker, director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE, said: "As well as taking statins, people with raised cholesterol levels and high blood pressure should reduce the amount of foods containing saturated fat they eat.
"They should exercise more and control their blood glucose levels by reducing their intake of sugar and by losing weight. They should also stop smoking."

Read more advice about lowering your cholesterol levels 
Analysis by Bazian. Edited by NHS Choices. Follow Behind the Headlines on Twitter. Join the Healthy Evidence forum.

Links to the headlines

Further reading


References
http://www.nhs.uk/news/2014/02February/Pages/NICE-publishes-new-draft-guidelines-on-statins-use.aspx (accessed 15th February 2014)

Saturday, 5 January 2013

Pravastatin Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and Patient Information Leaflet (PIL)

reposted from: www.tevauk.com
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.



Thursday, 27 December 2012

NICE guidelines on Lipid Management & Statins being updated

reposted from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/WaveR/123
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Following on from the CTT 2012 report, NICE are investigating new guidelines for use of statins for people with a <=10% risk of heart attack or stroke in next 10 years.

NICE guidelines on lipid management and use of Statins are being updated. See the scope and 2nd meeting (October 2012) minutes.

The risk assessment stage of the NHS Health Check (formerly known as the Vascular Check Programme) uses a risk engine for people aged 40–74 years to calculate their 10-year risk of CVD. Blood lipids, including cholesterol, are a modifiable risk factor for CVD. The risk of CVD is directly related to blood cholesterol levels and it is estimated that more than 50% of CVD in developed countries is a result of blood cholesterol levels higher than 3.8 mmol/litre. Blood cholesterol and other lipid components can be modified by drugs, physical activity and dietary changes; a multifactorial approach is likely to yield most benefit. (pg 2 of scope)

Key clinical issues that will be covered a) The most appropriate risk tool system to estimate a person’s absolute risk of developing CVD for: people without diabetes – for example, age alone, QRISK and Framingham risk assessment tools (10-year or lifetime risk)

Lipid modification strategy: for example, fixed dose or treating to a target lipid level.

c) Pharmacological interventions
(1) to reduce the risk of developing CVD (primary prevention) and (2) for secondary prevention in people with established CVD:
First-line treatment: statins.
Second-line treatment (alone or in combination with statins):
fibrates, anion-exchange resins, nicotinic acid group, omega-3 fatty acids.

5.1.1 NICE guidance to be updated
This guideline will update and replace the following NICE guidance:
Lipid modification. NICE clinical guideline 67 (2008).
Statins for the prevention of cardiovascular events. NICE technology appraisal guidance 94 (2006).


Sunday, 23 December 2012

Doctors should recommend aspirin to prevent heart disease & cancer.

reposted from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/12/opinion/the-2000-year-old-wonder-drug.html?pagewanted=1
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Should NICE and other UK medical authorities be recommending to doctors that most people in UK between 55-65 years should take a daily 75mg aspirin, as a cancer and heart disease preventative? 

David Agus is suggesting that public policy in USA should be to encourage aspirin’s use in those for whom the potential benefits would be obvious and the risks minimal.

Elsewhere, I've reviewed the case for preventative use of aspirin (90+ links), focussing on research by Peter Rothwell (50+ links) at Oxford.

The 2,000-Year-Old Wonder Drug Published: December 11 2012 with 107 Comments

David B. Agus (wikipedia) is a professor of medicine and engineering at the University of Southern California and the author of “The End of Illness.”


"THE inexorable rise in health care spending, as all of us know, is a problem. But what’s truly infuriating, as we watch America’s medical bill soar, is that our conversation has focused almost exclusively on how to pay for that care, not on reducing our need for it. In the endless debate about “health care reform,” few have zeroed in on the practical actions we should be taking now to make Americans healthier.

An exception is Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York, who is setting new standards that we would do well to adopt as a nation. In the last several years, he’s changed the city’s health code to mandate restrictions on sodas and trans fats — products that, when consumed over the long term, harm people. These new rules will undoubtedly improve New Yorkers’ health in years to come.

Such bold moves prompt a provocative question: when does regulating a person’s habits in the name of good health become our moral and social duty? The answer, I suggest, is a two-parter: first, when the scientific data clearly and overwhelmingly demonstrate that one behaviour or another can substantially reduce — or, conversely, raise — a person’s risk of disease; and second, when all of us are stuck paying for one another’s medical bills (which is what we do now, by way of Medicare, Medicaid and other taxpayer-financed health care programs).

In such cases, encouraging a healthy behaviour  or discouraging an unhealthy one, ought to be a matter of public policy — which is why, for instance, we insist on vaccinating children for the measles, mumps, rubella and polio; we know these preventive strategies save lives.

Under that rationale, then, why not make it public policy to encourage middle-aged people to use aspirin?

Developed in 1897 by the German chemist Felix Hoffmann, aspirin, or acetylsalicylic acid, has long proved its value as an analgesic. Two millenniums before that, Hippocrates, the father of modern medicine, used its active ingredient — which he extracted from the bark and leaves of the willow tree — to help alleviate pain and fevers.

Since then, we've gained insight into both the biological mechanism and the effects of this chemical compound. Many high-quality research studies have confirmed that the use of aspirin substantially reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. Indeed, the evidence for this is so abundant and clear that, in 2009, the United States Preventive Services Task Force strongly recommended that men ages 45 to 79, and women ages 55 to 79, take a low-dose aspirin pill daily, with the exception for those who are already at higher risk for gastrointestinal bleeding or who have certain other health issues. (As an anticoagulant, aspirin can increase the risk of bleeding — a serious and potentially deadly issue for some people.)

New reports about aspirin’s benefits in cancer prevention are just as convincing. In 2011, British researchers [Peter Rothwell - over 50 links on crabsallover blog], analysing data from some 25,000 patients in eight long-term studies, found that a small, 75-milligram dose of aspirin taken daily for at least five years reduced the risk of dying from common cancers by 21 percent.

In March, The Lancet published two more papers bolstering the case for this ancient drug. The first, reviewing five long-term studies involving more than 17,000 patients, found that a daily low-dose aspirin lowered the risk of getting adenocarcinomas — common malignant cancers that develop in the lungs, colon and prostate — by an average of 46 percent.

In the second, researchers at Oxford and other centres compared patients who took aspirin with those who didn’t in 51 different studies. Investigators found that the risk of dying from cancer was 37 percent lower among those taking aspirin for at least five years. In a subsection of the study group, three years of daily aspirin use reduced the risk of developing cancer by almost 25 percent when compared with the aspirin-free control group.

The data are screaming out to us. Aspirin, one of the oldest remedies on the planet, helps prevent heart disease through what is likely to be a variety of mechanisms, including keeping blood clots from forming. And experts believe it helps prevent cancer, in part, by dampening an immune response called inflammation.


So the question remains: given the evidence we have, why is it merely voluntary for physicians to inform their patients about a health care intervention that could not only help them, but also save untold billions in taxpayer dollars each year?

For some men over the age of 45 and women over 55, the risks of taking aspirin outweigh any benefits — and patients should talk with their doctors before taking any medication, including something as familiar as aspirin.

But with such caveats in place, it still ought to be possible to encourage aspirin’s use in those for whom the potential benefits would be obvious and the risks minimal. Just as we discourage smoking through advertising campaigns, for example, shouldn't we suggest that middle-aged Americans speak to their doctors about aspirin? Perhaps pharmacists or even health insurance companies should be enlisted to help spread the word about this disease-prevention drug?

The right policy will have to be hammered out, of course. But if we’re going to address the country’s sky-high medical bill, we’re going to have to address the need for Americans to be active in protecting their own health.

Everyone may want the right to use tobacco products and engage in other behaviours that are unequivocally linked with disease — or have the right not to wear a seat belt and refrain from other actions that may protect their well-being. But, if so, should society have the obligation to cover the costs of the consequences?

As the former Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart once said, “There is a big difference between what we have the right to do and what is right to do.” Health care reform should, at long last, focus on the latter."



Thursday, 27 January 2011

NICE issues new guidance on preventing skin cancer

reposted from: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/news/archive/cancernews/2011-01-27-NICE-issues-new-guidance-on-preventing-skin-cancer-?rss=true
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.


Thursday 27 January 2011

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has published new guidelines to help the NHS, local authorities and other organisations in their work to prevent skin cancer.
The guidelines say that some sun exposure is important, as it allows people to make vitamin D as well as providing an opportunity to be physically active.
But too much exposure to UV light is known to increase the risk of skin cancer.
Professor Mike Kelly, director of the institute's Centre for Public Health Excellence, revealed that about 100,000 people each year are diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer and over 10,000 with malignant melanoma, the most serious type of skin cancer.
He explained: "Through this guidance we hope to raise awareness of the risks of UV exposure and help people to protect themselves and others.
"Simple actions can greatly reduce the risk of developing skin cancer - opting to stay in the shade, wearing protective clothing in the sun, avoiding too much sun during the middle of the day and using sunscreen can all have an effect."
The guidance contains simple and practical recommendations for preventing over-exposure to the sun.
For instance, developers should attempt to create shaded areas around buildings, while schools should encourage children to use sunscreen and stay in the shade during breaks.

Sara Hiom, director of health information at Cancer Research UK, said that avoiding sunburn is one of the best ways to reduce the risk of skin cancer.
"Many of us like to make the most of the UK's rare sunny days and should be able to enjoy the sun safely.
"If we all make sure that our skin doesn't redden or burn in the sun, it could help to reduce the rocketing number of people who develop skin cancer every year. And that's the aim of Cancer Research UK's annual SunSmart campaign."

Wednesday, 23 June 2010

NICE review of cost effectiveness of Statins


2006 review by NICE includes trial data, benefits and cost effectiveness of statins in preventing CVD

NICE recommendations on how to reduce CVD (Cardiovascular disease)

reposted from: NHS Choices


Protect the population from the harmful effects of trans fats
  • Eliminate the use of industrially produced trans fatty acids (IPTFAs) for human consumption.
  • In line with other EU countries (specifically Denmark and Austria), introduce legislation to ensure that IPTFA levels do not exceed 2% in the fats and oils used in food manufacturing and cooking.
  • Establish guidelines for local authorities to independently monitor IPTFA levels in the restaurant, fast-food and home food trades using existing statutory powers (in relation to trading standards or environmental health)

Does this guidance apply to me?

This guidance is aimed at improving the health of the population as a whole. It makes recommendations to people who can make changes to improve population health.
However, the principles underlying the recommendations also apply to individuals. For example, most people should reduce their salt, saturated fat and trans fat intake, as well as increasing their levels of physical activity.
Related NICE guidance focuses more on individuals, including guidance on stopping and preventing smoking and tobacco control, physical activity, obesity, high blood pressure and mother and child nutrition.

Links To The Headlines

Slash salt to 'prevent thousands of deaths. Daily Express, June 22 2010
Plea to stop using trans-fats. Financial Times, June 22 2010
5-point plan to save 40,000 lives. Daily Mirror, June 22 2010

Links To Science