Pages

Showing posts with label statins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label statins. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Statins are 'safe, effective and should be used more widely'

reposted from: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2016/09September/Pages/Statins-safe-effective-and-should-be-used-more-widely.aspx

"Large-scale evidence from randomised trials shows that statin therapy reduces
the risk of major vascular events (ie, coronary deaths or myocardial infarctions, strokes, and coronary revascularisation procedures) by about one-quarter for each mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol during each year (after the first) that
it continues to be taken." Source: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(16)31357-5.pdf


Thursday, 24 July 2014

'More adults should be taking statins,' says NICE

reposted from: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2014/07July/Pages/More-adults-should-be-taking-statins-says-NICE.aspx
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Reading the peer-reviewed literature on statins and other reports, I've suspected, for more than a year, that this advice (20mg/day Atorvastatin if QRISK2 10-year risk of CVD is 10% or more) would  be recommended by NICE.

"Doctors have been told to offer cholesterol-lowering statins to millions more people," BBC News reports.
New guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommend lowering the bar for statin use in adults at risk of heart disease. 
NICE suggests up to 8,000 lives could be saved every three years if everyone with a 10% risk of developing cardiovascular disease within the next 10 years is offered one of the widely used cholesterol-lowering medications.
Cardiovascular diseases are diseases affecting the heart and blood vessels, such as heart disease and stroke.
NICE says the evidence clearly shows statins are safe and effective and would be a good use of healthcare resources if given to these people.
The announcement has been met with a variable response, with the Daily Mail saying up to half of all adults could now be eligible for the drugs, and that, "GPs warn of chaos" at being "told to trawl medical records to find at-risk patients".
On the other side of the argument, Professor Baker, director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE, says the new recommendations would not create an additional workload for GPs.
On the NICE website, he said: "Most patients will already be under surveillance by their GPs, so this won't add any additional workload. But you can do the QRISK2 risk assessment yourself. It can be done online or via an app, so it doesn't need to be done by the GP."
You can assess your own risk online using a risk assessment tool based on factors such as smoking history, body mass index (BMI) and family history of heart disease.
The NICE guidelines have now been published, which means they will come into effect in the NHS in England. However, NICE still recommends preventable lifestyle measures, such as losing weight or stopping smoking, are addressed first before starting statin treatment.
Ultimately, the decision to take a statin – even if it is recommended – will always remain a choice that sits with the patient.

Statins and reporting bias

Visit any medical news forum or comment board, such as the Mail Online's health section, and search for statins, and you will see stories of statins causing terrible side effects – for example, how statins left a person "crippled with pain and brain fog".

While the issue of side effects should never be ignored, the bad press statins get online could be an example of reporting bias in action – where there is selective reporting (or suppression) of information.

In other words, people who tolerated statins poorly are more likely to report that fact than people who have been taking them for years with no adverse effects. Similarly, most UK newspapers are unlikely to run an "I took statins, I had no side effects, and they probably prevented a heart attack" story. Good news rarely shifts newspapers or gets clicks on websites.

What are statins?

Statins are usually the first medication of choice to reduce the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL, or "bad")cholesterol in the blood.
Cholesterol and other fatty substances can build up and clog the arteries in the heart and elsewhere in the body, leading to cardiovascular diseases. Reducing cholesterol levels helps reduce the risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack or stroke.
Examples of statin drugs aresimvastatin and atorvastatin, which come as tablets. The recommended treatment course is to usually take a tablet once a day for life.

What is NICE recommending?

NICE has published an update to its previous clinical guideline on the cardiovascular risk assessment and management of lipids (fats in the blood, which includes cholesterol and triglycerides) in people who either already have cardiovascular disease (such as those who've had a heart attack or stroke), or people who are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
The main new recommendations are that:
  • A systematic strategy should be used in general practice to identify people who are likely to be at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD).
  • People should be prioritised for a full risk assessment if their estimated 10-year risk of CVD is 10% or more (using the QRISK2 assessment tool).
  • Before starting lipid-lowering medications for the prevention of CVD, at least one blood sample should be taken to measure total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL, or "good") cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations.
  • In people who have a 10% or greater risk of developing CVD within the next 10 years, the recommended statin to start treatment with is atorvastatin, given at a dose of 20mg daily.
  • In people who already have established CVD (people who have heart disease or have had a stroke), the recommended starting dose of atorvastatin is 80mg daily (unless there are side effects or other contraindications).
For people at risk of developing CVD within the next 10 years, the recommendations to start 20mg atorvastatin applies to adults of all ages, including people over the age of 85 years (in very elderly people, statins may reduce the risk of a non-fatal heart attack). This advice stands unless there are other health-related factors that make statin treatment inappropriate.
NICE does make several important provisions around decisions to start treatment for the prevention of CVD in people considered to be at risk.
These are outlined below.

Patient-doctor discussion

The decision whether to start a statin should be made after an informed discussion between the doctor and patient about the risks and benefits of treatment, taking into account factors such as:
  • possible benefits from lifestyle modifications (measures that could be tried first before starting a statin, such as exercising more, eating a healthier diet and stopping smoking)
  • patient preference
  • other medical illnesses
  • the problems of adding another tablet if the person is already taking a lot of daily medications
  • general frailty and life expectancy

Lifestyle changes

Before starting statin treatment, assessment should be made into other health and lifestyle factors that may need management, including:
  • smoking and alcohol consumption
  • blood pressure
  • BMI
  • diabetes
  • kidney or liver disease
The benefits of optimising all other modifiable lifestyle risk factors (for example, overweight/obesity or smoking) should be discussed, and people offered support for this if needed, such as exercise referral programmes.
Statin treatment may then be considered if lifestyle modifications don't work.

What is the rationale for lowering the threshold for the drugs?

Currently, one-third of deaths in the UK are caused by cardiovascular disease, accounting for around 180,000 deaths each year.
Cardiovascular disease is well known to have a significant burden of disability. It is believed £8 billion of healthcare resources are tied up in the disease.
Professor Mark Baker, director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE, says: "Doctors have been giving statins to 'well people' since NICE first produced guidance on this in 2006. We are now recommending the threshold is reduced further.
"The overwhelming body of evidence supports their use, even in people at low risk of CVD. The effectiveness of these medicines is now well proven and their cost has fallen. The weight of evidence clearly shows statins are safe and cost effective for use in people with a 10% risk of CVD over 10 years."
Dr Anthony Wierzbicki, from Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, and chair of the Guideline Development Group, also commented on the new guidance: "We've been able to simplify the guideline so it's now much easier for patients to be assessed and for GPs and nurses to make sense of the results. There is greater clarity, a simpler framework, and a systematic way of identifying people who could benefit from treatment.
"We've got the best evidence base, huge numbers, and the biggest set of clinical trials ever done. Other areas of medicine would give their teeth for this evidence, it's that good. Statins work, they are very cheap, and are becoming considerably cheaper as they come off-patent, which, in a cost-limited health service, is a big consideration.
"That enables us to actually say that we should treat people with heart disease a lot more intensively because we know that will prevent further events. In people with diabetes or kidney disease, giving a statin will reduce heart attacks and strokes. For people at risk of heart disease, if lifestyle measures fail, we have a second option of giving them a statin if they want and require it."

Are there any risks or side effects with statins?

Statins are fairly safe drugs, though there are a range of possible side effects and groups of people who should use them with caution. This includes people with an underactive thyroid, kidney disease and liver disease. Women should also not take statins while pregnant or breastfeeding.
Possible side effects include headaches and dizziness, sleep disturbances, fatigue, tummy disturbances, altered sensation, and sensitivity reactions such as rash or itching.
Very rarely, statins have been associated with the risk of having a toxic effect on the muscles, causing muscle pain and weakness, and even a serious condition called rhabdomyolysis, where the muscle fibres start to break down.
However, the risks and benefits would be discussed and taken into account for any individual before a statin is prescribed, including their personal and family medical history.

How has the announcement been received by the media?

As the BBC News headline indicates, NICE's decision has been met with controversy. 
Professor Mark Baker, the director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE is quoted as saying: "Prevention is better than cure. One of the mainstays of modern medicine is to use treatments to prevent bad things happening in the future. It's why we use vaccines and immunisation to prevent infectious disease, it's why we use drugs to lower blood pressure to prevent heart attacks, strokes, and kidney disease, and it's why we're using statins now."
Meanwhile, in opposing camps there is debate about "medicalising" a nation and encouraging people to just pop a pill rather than following a healthy lifestyle.
The British Medical Association's General Practitioner Committee is quoted as saying: "There is insufficient evidence of significant overall benefit to low-risk individuals to allow GPs to have confidence in the recommendation. The measure would distort health spending priorities and disadvantage other patients."
However, as quoted in the Daily Mail, Professor Baker responded: "It is ludicrous to suggest that we are overmedicalising the population when the whole point of using modern, safe and effective drugs in an economic way is to prevent bad things happening in the future."
Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the British Medical Association's GP committee, feels NICE has not taken into account the additional pressures they'll be placing on GPs. "In making their decision, NICE has failed to take the current pressures on general practice into account, and the further impact this will have on already overstretched GPs and those patients requiring treatment for other illnesses."
Despite the extensive debate and opposition, as BBC News also highlights, the 10% threshold for statin treatment is comparable to that already used in other European countries.
As the president of the Academy of Medical Sciences, Professor Sir John Tooke, points out on the BBC News website: "Whether or not someone takes drugs to diminish their risk is a matter of personal choice, but it must be informed by accurate information on the balance of risk and benefit in their particular case. The weight of evidence suggests statins are effective, affordable and have an acceptable risk-benefit profile."

Conclusion

Despite somewhat hysterical media coverage to the contrary ("millions more to be given statins," according to the Daily Express), nobody will be forced to take statins.
If your GP does recommend statins, you should ask them to explain the benefits and risks for you personally of starting statin treatment. You may want to find out more about statins before making up your mind – the NHS Choices Health A-Z information on statins is a good place to start.
If you do experience troublesome side effects while taking statins, contact your GP or the doctor in charge of your care. It could be the case that adjusting your dosage or switching to a different type of statin could help relieve any side effects.
Analysis by Bazian. Edited by NHS ChoicesFollow Behind the Headlines on TwitterJoin the Healthy Evidence forum.

Wednesday, 11 June 2014

Scrap plan to extend statin use, say doctors

reposted from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-27784711
By Nick Triggle Health correspondent, BBC News 11 June 2014 Last updated at 00:33
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Proposals to extend the use of statins should be scrapped, a group of leading doctors and academics says.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence published draft guidance in February calling for their use to be extended to save more lives.
It could mean another five million people in England and Wales using them on top of seven million who already do.
But in a letter to NICE and ministers, the experts expressed concern about the medicalisation of healthy people.
The letter said the draft advice was overly reliant on industry-sponsored trials, which "grossly underestimate adverse effects".
And it added: "The benefits in a low-risk population do not justify putting approximately five million more people on drugs that will then have to be taken lifelong."
The drugs reduce levels of cholesterol in the blood, lowering the risk of a heart attack or stroke.
The signatories include Royal College of Physicians president Sir Richard Thompson and former Royal College of GPs chairwoman Clare Gerada as well as cardiologists and leading academics.
Side-effects
Prof Simon Capewell, an expert in clinical epidemiology at Liverpool University and one of the signatories, said: "The recent statin recommendations are deeply worrying, effectively condemning all middle-aged adults to lifelong medications of questionable value.
"They steal huge funds from a cash-strapped NHS and they steal attention from the major responsibilities that government and food industry have to promote healthier life choices for ourselves and our children."
Currently, doctors are meant to offer statin tablets to the estimated seven million people who have a 20% chance of developing cardiovascular disease over 10 years, based on risk factors such as their age, sex, whether they smoke and what they weigh.
line break
Statins and risk
• Statins are a group of medicines that can help lower rates of so-called "bad cholesterol" in the blood
• They do this by curbing the production of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the liver
• High rates of LDL are potentially dangerous as they can lead to hardening and narrowing of the arteries, known as atherosclerosis, which increases the risks of strokes and heart attacks
• Doctors use a risk calculator called QRisk2 to work out a person's chance of having a stroke or heart attack to decide if they should be given statins
• The calculation factors include age, weight and smoking
• If someone has a 10-year QRisk2 score of 20%, then in a crowd of 100 people like them, on average, 20 people would get cardiovascular disease over the next 10 years
line break
But the draft guidance suggested that people with as low as a 10% risk should be offered the treatment.
The NHS currently spends about £450m a year on statins. If the draft recommendations went ahead, this bill would increase substantially, although the drugs have become significantly cheaper over the years.
Cardiovascular disease develops when fatty substances build up in the arteries and narrow them, which can lead to heart attacks and stroke.
Too much cholesterol in the blood can lead to these fatty deposits. Statin drugs work by lowering cholesterol.
Eating a healthy diet, doing regular exercise and keeping slim will also help lower cholesterol.
Like all medicines, statins have potential side-effects. They have been linked to muscle, liver and kidney problems, but just how common these are is a contentious issue.
One of the signatories to the letter is London cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who last month had to withdraw claims he made in a British Medical Journal article that a fifth of people who use statins experience side-effects.
Mike Knapton, of the British Heart Foundation, said NICE was right to want to extend the use of statins.
"Evidence shows that statins are a safe, effective, cholesterol-lowering drug and proven to lower the risk of heart disease."
He added that, if anything, NICE should go further by looking at the lifetime risk rather than 10-year timeframe being proposed.
NICE has consulted on its draft proposals and is expected to publish final guidance at the end of July.
Prof Mark Baker, from NICE, said as well as the consultation the recommendations are being peer-reviewed.
He also pointed out that the guidance did not say patients had to go on these drugs - as GPs and patients can also discuss lifestyle changes to reduce risk - but just gave them the option of using them.
"This guidance does not medicalise millions of healthy people. On the contrary, it will help prevent many from becoming ill and dying prematurely," he added.

Saturday, 5 April 2014

No proof Earl Grey can fight heart disease

reposted from: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2014/04April/Pages/Earl-Grey-unproven-as-replacement-for-statins.aspx
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

A cup of Earl Grey 'as good as statins' at fighting heart disease,” reports The Daily Telegraph, entirely without proof.

The science behind this headline did not show Earl Grey was as good as statins (a class of drugs used to lower high cholesterol) in people.

The study was early stage research on a small group of rats in a laboratory. None of the research involved humans, tea, or any assessment of heart disease.

The research involved an extract called HGMF, taken from the bergamot fruit; a citrus fruit used to flavour teas such as Earl Grey.

Rats with high cholesterol levels were fed a high cholesterol diet for three weeks and given either the bergamot extract (HMGF) or the commonly used statinsimvastatin.

The researchers found that HMGF had cholesterol-lowering effects similar to that of simvastatin. Though importantly, as the research was in rats, it is not possible to say that HGMF would work the same way in humans, unless directly tested.

Furthermore, this study tested a pure extract rather than tea containing the extract, the effects of which may be different. For instance it is unclear how much Earl Grey you would need to be exposed to a comparable level of HGMF; it may take gallons of the stuff.

This study is absolutely not a reason to stop taking prescribed statins to replace them by drinking Earl Grey tea as this could be dangerous.

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from the University of Calabria (Italy) and was funded by the Italian National Project.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Functional Foods.

The Daily Telegraph and the Mail Online reporting was potentially misleading and arguably irresponsible.

While the main body of the article was factually accurate, the headlines (one of which was on the front page of the Telegraph) implied that drinking Earl Grey tea had been proven to be as effective as statins.

Statins are known to be effective and have a large weight of evidence from human research proving this. By contrast, the effects of Earl Grey tea, as far as we are aware, have barely been researched, so they are not on an equal playing field. So suggestions that Earl Grey is “just as effective” are unfounded.

This could have encouraged people who had been prescribed statins, some of which are at high risk of experiencing a cardiovascular disease such as a heart attack or stroke, to stop taking their medication.

What kind of research was this?

This was an animal study looking at the effect of bergamot extract on the cholesterol profile of rats with high cholesterol and comparing it with a commonly used statin called simvastatin.

Statins are a class of related drugs currently used to lower cholesterol levels in people at risk of cardiovascular disease, the main cause of death in many westernised countries. The drugs lower cholesterol levels by acting on an enzyme called 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR) in the body.

The researchers were looking to see if other compounds might work in a similar way to statins and affect the same enzyme. They decided to investigate bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso), a citrus fruit widespread in the Mediterranean area.

The fruit has anecdotal cholesterol-lowering properties and the study authors said it was only toxic at very high levels, implying it might be relatively safe. The researchers state bergamot essence is used in teas, jams and sherbet, but there was no special mention of Earl Grey in the underlying research. It appears the media has made a link with this specific tea as it apparently contains high levels of the extract and is well known to a UK readership.

What did the research involve?

The study used 48 rats with high cholesterol to compare the cholesterol-lowering effects of bergamot extract 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl flavanones (HMGF) with the commonly-used statin, simvastatin. The rats’ diets were carefully controlled so all that differed was their cholesterol treatment – bergamot or statin.

Body weight, blood cholesterol levels, cellular protein levels, liver enzyme activity and genetic regulatory mechanisms were all monitored and recoded for evidence of cholesterol-lowering properties in the different treatment groups.

Contrary to the headlines, the experiments involved a dry extract from bergamot fruit peel. Unfortunately for the rats they did not get to sample any tea, Earl Grey or otherwise. 

The important measures were total cholesterol, another type of blood fat (triglycerides), and specific subtypes of cholesterol called very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). HDLs are the so called “good” cholesterol, whereas LDLs are the “bad” cholesterol. This is a simplistic account of their roles within the body, but is sometimes useful.

Before the experiment all rats were stabilised on regular rodent food before being randomly divided into four groups of 12 animals each:
  • control group: received a regular diet for three weeks
  • high cholesterol control group: received a high cholesterol diet for three weeks (regular diet +2% cholesterol +0.2% cholic acid; a bile acid that has a role in fat absorption and moderating cholesterol levels)
  • high cholesterol group treated with statin: received the high cholesterol diet for three weeks (regular diet +2% cholesterol +0.2% cholic acid); from the 2nd to the 3rd week each rat was given simvastatin (20 mg/kg bodyweight/day) 
  • high cholesterol group treated with bergamot extract HMGF: received the high cholesterol diet (regular diet +2% cholesterol +0.2% cholic acid) for three weeks; from the 2nd to the 3rd week each rat was given HMGF (60 mg/kg bodyweight/day
The main analysis compared the cholesterol lowering effects of simvastatin with the bergamot extract HMGF.

What were the basic results?

Both the bergamot extract and simvastatin reduced total cholesterol (in blood and in the liver), triglyceride levels, and VLDL and LDL levels – the bad cholesterol. However, an increase in HDL content – the good cholesterol – was observed exclusively in the HMGF-treated rats.
Both bergamot extract and simvastatin regulated enzymes were involved in cholesterol metabolism in a similar way at a protein and gene regulation level. This implied the changes observed were not coming from some other secondary effects of the extract and were direct result of changes to how cholesterol was metabolised in the rats’ livers.
The study investigated the safety of the extract to some degree. It found the extract had a low toxicity to cells in the body, and did not cause DNA damage at doses lower than 90 micrograms per millilitre.

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers stated that their study “demonstrated that the three statin-like flavanones, extracted from bergamot peel and contained in HMGF, exert a similar behaviour [in] respect to commercial simvastatin on a model of hypercholesterolaemic rats [rats with high cholesterol levels]” and that “the daily supplementation of HMGF in the diet could be very effective for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia”.

Conclusion

This animal experiment indicated that the bergamot extract HMGF may have cholesterol-lowering effects similar to that of the commonly used statin, simvastatin, when given to mice with high cholesterol levels that were fed high cholesterol diets for three weeks.
The main limitation of the study was that none of the research involved humans. Therefore, it is not possible to say the bergamot extract would work the same way in humans, unless directly tested. Furthermore, this rat study tested a pure extract rather than tea containing the extract, the effects of which may be different. For instance, taking milk in tea could potentially affect how the extract is metabolised in the body compared to a pure extract.

The headlines indicated Earl Grey tea could help fight heart disease, but based on the underlying research study only, there is little evidence for that. Also the study made no assessment of the long-term health benefits of the reductions in cholesterol in the rats. For example, the effects may have been temporary.

There needs to be more robust research in humans to find out if bergamot extract holds any real promise in lowering cholesterol levels and so fighting cardiovascular diseases such as heart disease and strokes in the future.

We would not want anyone to think this research is a reason to stop taking statins and replace them with drinking tea containing bergamot extract; this could potentially be dangerous. If you have any concerns about your cholesterol levels, or any cholesterol-lowering treatments that you are currently prescribed, consult your doctor.
Analysis by Bazian. Edited by NHS Choices. Follow Behind the Headlines on Twitter. Join the Healthy Evidence forum.

Tuesday, 1 April 2014

JBS3 Report

reposted from: http://www.jbs3risk.com/pages/report.htm
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Recommendations from each section

General Recommendations
  • Use JBS3 risk calculator to estimate both 10-year risk and lifetime risk of CVD in all individuals except for those with existing CVD or certain high risk diseases i.e. diabetes age >40 years, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5, or familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH).
  • Total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol from a non-fasting blood sample should be used for lipid profile estimate of CVD risk in the JBS3 calculator
  • Non-HDL-cholesterol, measured from a non-fasting blood sample as total cholesterol minus HDL-cholesterol, should be used in preference to LDL-cholesterol as the treatment goal for lipid-lowering therapy.
  • Intensive risk factor modification with diet, lifestyle intervention and pharmacological therapy in patients with existing CVD, without the need for estimation of CVD risk.
  • Intensive risk factor modification with diet, lifestyle intervention and pharmacological therapy, in individuals at particularly high risk of developing CVD: i.e. diabetics age >40 years, patients with CKD stages 3–5, or FH without the need for estimation of CVD risk.
  • Diet, lifestyle intervention and pharmacological therapy in people at high short-term risk. Thresholds for treatment with statins based on 10-year CVD risk will be informed by NICE guidelines.
  • Diet, lifestyle intervention and for some people, pharmacological therapy, in those with increased modifiable lifetime risk as informed by JBS3 calculator metrics.

2. Lifestyle Recommendations

Smoking
  • Professional support on how to stop smoking should be given, at every available opportunity, with provision of self-help material and referral to more intensive support, e.g. stop smoking services.
  • The JBS3 risk calculator emphasises the benefits for early smoking cessation and the diminishing but still substantial returns for quitting at an older age.
  • Patients should be offered behavioural counselling, group therapy, pharmacotherapy or a combination of treatments that have been proven to be effective.
  • Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline or bupropion should be offered to people who are planning to stop smoking as part of an abstinent-contingent treatment in which the smoker makes a commitment to stop smoking on or before a particular date (target stop date).
  • People who have heart or respiratory diseases, and those who live with them, should be made aware of the risks of both active and passive smoking (second-hand smoke).
  • For specific recommendations on quitting smoking in pregnancy and following childbirth, see NICE public health guidance 26.
  • The importance of stopping smoking during pregnancy should be emphasized and guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) followed.[1]
Diet
Professional support to consume a diet associated with the lowest cardiovascular risk should be provided based on the following principles:
  • Intake of saturated fat to <10% of total fat intake (preferably in lean meat and low-fat dairy products)
  • Replace saturated fat with poly-unsaturated fat where possible
  • Consume five portions per day of fruit and vegetables
  • Consume at least two servings of fish (preferably oily) per week
  • Consider regular consumption of whole grains and nuts
  • Keep salt consumption <6 g per day
  • Limit alcohol intake to <21 units per week for men and <14 units per week for women
  • Avoid/reduce consumption of:
    • Processed meats or commercially produced foods which tend to be high in salt and trans fatty acids
    • Refined carbohydrates, such as white bread, processed cereals
    • Sugar-sweetened beverages
    • Calorie-rich, but nutritionally poor snacks, such as sweets, cakes and crisps
  • Children and young people should be supported to consume a diet based on the same principles.
Physical activity and exercise
  • An increase in overall levels of sustained physical activity and avoidance of prolonged sedentary behaviour are important for reduction of CVD risk.
  • Emphasise walking, cycling and other aerobic physical daily activities, at moderate intensity, as part of an active lifestyle, for at least 150 minutes per week in bouts of ≥ten minutes, or 75 minutes per week of vigorous physical activity, or a combination of the two.
  • Muscle-strengthening activities performed on at least two occasions per week
Exercise training
General population and those at low to moderate risk of CVD:
  • Exercise training, incorporating a warm up and cool down period, should be performed at moderate to high intensity two to three times per week for 30 to 40 minutes each time.
  • The mode of exercise should be aerobic and, where possible, continuous allowing for a steady progression in effort, e.g. walking programmes, cycling, jogging, swimming.
  • The time spent exercise training contributes to meeting the 150 minutes per week physical activity recommendation (as above).
Patients with established CVD and those considered at higher risk of CVD:
  • A more structured approach is needed in managing patients and in all cases, assessment and specific goal setting, with risk stratification, delivered by professionals skilled in health-related exercise is preferable.
  • Exercise on referral and community-based exercise initiatives are recommended for patients at risk of CVD.
  • Cardiac rehabilitation programmes are recommended for patients with established CVD and in those following a CVD event.

3. Childhood and Adult Obesity Recommendations

  • Multidisciplinary approaches to obesity management in children and young people are required with a 'lifetime risk' message. These include interventions during the early post-partum period as well as regular monitoring of childhood weight and family counselling.
  • With appropriate training all health care professions should be able to Ask and Assess adiposity and Advise appropriate adult patients on evidence based ways to target weight change.

4. Lipid Recommendations

  • Non-fasting blood samples should be taken to measure total cholesterol (TC) and HDL-cholesterol. The JBS3 risk calculator enables entry of these two measures and it is expected that non-HDL-c (TC minus HDL-c = non-HDL-c) will gradually replace LDL-c in clinical practice as well as in clinical trials.
  • All high risk people should receive professional lifestyle support to reduce total and LDL-c, raise HDL-c, and lower triglycerides to reduce their CVD risk.
  • Cholesterol-lowering drug therapy is recommended in:
    • Patients with established CVD
    • Individuals at particularly high risk of CVD: diabetes age > 40 years, patients with CKD stages 3-5, or FH
    • Individuals with high 10-year CVD risk (threshold to be defined by NICE guidance)
    • Individuals with high lifetime CVD risk estimated from heart age and other JBS3 calculator metrics, in whom lifestyle changes alone are considered insufficient by the physician and person concerned
  • Statins are recommended as they are highly effective at reducing CVD events with evidence of benefit to LDL-c levels <2 mmol/L which justifies intensive non-HDL-c lowering.
  • Statins are safe with trial evidence showing no effects on non-cardiovascular mortality or cancer. There is a small increase in risk of developing diabetes but the benefits of cholesterol lowering greatly exceed any risk associated with diabetes. If statin intolerance develops a stepwise strategy involving switching agents and re-dosing is recommended.
  • Despite low HDL-c levels contributing to CVD risk, drug therapy to raise HDL has not been shown to reduce CVD risk and is not currently indicated.

5. Blood Pressure Recommendations

  • Hypertension should be suspected when office BP is persistently elevated, i.e. ≥140/90mmHg.
  • Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is recommended to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension (Daytime mean ABPM 135/85mmHg).
  • All high risk people should receive professional lifestyle support to reduce their blood pressure which may avoid the need for, or complement the use of, drug therapy for hypertension and reduce CVD risk.
  • People with an office BP >160/100 mmHg, an 24-hour day time ABPM average or home APBM average of >150/95 mmHg (stage 2 hypertension) should be offered pharmacological therapy to reduce BP.
  • People with an office BP >140/90 mmHg, but <160/100 mmHg, a 24-hour daytime ABPM average or home APBM average of >135/85 mmHg (stage 1 hypertension) and established CVD, hypertensive target organ damage, diabetes, CKD, or a high lifetime risk assessed by JBS3 calculator, should be offered pharmacological therapy to reduce BP.
  • People with stage 1 hypertension without established CVD, hypertensive target organ damage, diabetes, CKD, or a significant increase in lifetime risk assessed by JBS3 calculator, should receive advice on lifestyle interventions and be scheduled for annual BP and lifetime risk assessment to inform future need for therapy.
  • Pharmacological treatment for patients with hypertension should follow the current NICE guidance (CG127) treatment algorithm:
    • Patients <55 years of age should be offered an ACE inhibitor or ARB as preferred initial therapy
    • Patients aged ≥55 years should be offered a Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB) as preferred initial therapy
  • Combinations of drug treatment are usually required to optimise BP control for the majority of patients.
  • Thiazide-like diuretics are an alternative to CCB and are preferred for patients intolerant of CCBs, or with heart failure or at high risk of heart failure.
  • Beta-blockers are not preferred unless there are specific indications for use, i.e. in patients with symptomatic angina or chronic heart failure.
  • For pregnant women or women planning pregnancy, when BP treatment is being considered, the recommendations of the NICE guideline CG107 Hypertension in pregnancy should be followed.


Monday, 31 March 2014

Why take statins? - British Heart Foundation

reposted from: https://www.bhf.org.uk/heart-health/treatment/statins.aspx

Statins

Statin drugs - British Heart Foundation

Statins are the most commonly prescribed medicines in the UK. They work to lower the level of cholesterol in your blood. There are different types of statins, but they all work in much the same way.

Why do I need to lower my cholesterol?

Cholesterol is essential for your body to work well, but too much ‘bad cholesterol’ (called low-density lipoprotein or LDL) is unhealthy. Statins reduce the amount of ‘bad cholesterol’ your body makes.
High levels of ‘bad cholesterol’ in your blood can lead to fatty deposits building up in your arteries. This can increase your risk of developing cardiovascular disease, which includes conditions such ascoronary heart disease  (leading to angina and heart attack) and stroke.
Your body will always make cholesterol so if you stop taking a statin, it’s likely your cholesterol levels will rise. If you are prescribed a statin, you need to take it every day. Statins are most beneficial when you take them on a long-term basis.

Why do I need to take statins? 

If you’ve had a heart attack or stroke, you may be advised to take statins in order to reduce your risk of another event. If you have peripheral arterial disease statins can help to slow the progression. If you are diabetic, you are at a much higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, and taking statins will help to reduce this risk.
Even if you’re in good health, you may be prescribed statins if you’re at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease, for example, if you have a strong family history of cardiovascular disease. Statins can help lower your risk.

When should I take my statin?

It’s important to take your medication regularly as prescribed. Most statins are taken at night, as this is when most of your cholesterol is produced. Check with your doctor or pharmacist when you should be taking your statin.
Most statins come as tablets. The most common one is simvastatin.
Look up your medication on the Medicine Guides website.

Are there any foods, drinks or other medications I should avoid? 

Check with your doctor or pharmacist before you take any other medications. Taking certain medicines together may affect how well they work.
If you’re taking simvastatin or atorvastatin, avoid grapefruit and grapefruit juice as they can increase your risk of side effects.
If you take another type of statin, limit your intake of grapefruit juice to very small quantities or you may want to avoid it all together.

Do statins have side effects?

Like all medication, statins have potential side effects. The most common are muscular aches and pains, but many people experience none at all. Statins are among the safest and the most studied medications available today.
If you do experience side effects, or if your side effects change or become worse, tell your GP.
Statins target the liver cells where cholesterol is made. Before you start taking statins, you will have a blood test to check how well your liver works. Your doctor may request that you have a follow-up blood test a few months later. If your liver is affected, your doctor may want to reduce your dose or change your statin to another kind of medication that lowers your cholesterol.
Find out about other possible side effects from our Statins information sheet.

Can I buy statins over the counter?

Low-dose statins are available at some pharmacies without a prescription, but they are not a substitute for prescription statins or for making lifestyle changes to reduce your cholesterol level. If you are at high risk of heart disease, your doctor may prescribe a statin for you.

What are the differences between statins?

Lots of people don’t need a strong statin to reduce their cholesterol level. Your GP or cardiologist will find the right statin for you, depending on your medical history and the cholesterol level they think you should aim for.
If you’re sensitive to one statin, you might not be sensitive to another. You should have a blood test after any change of statin to see how effectively the new medicine is lowering your cholesterol.

Can I take a statin if I'm pregnant?

If you’re pregnant, breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy, you should not take statins. If you’re already taking statins but would like to become pregnant, speak to your GP first.

How else can I lower my cholesterol?

You can also lower your cholesterol by:

Statins reduce my risk of heart attack or stroke by 20%!

I started taking statins (Pravastatin 10mg/day) in January 2013 after I decided that statins would be good for my health.

With QRISK.org I reckon I have cut my risk of a heart attack or stroke in the next 10 years from 7.8% to 6.3%, a 20% reduction. I've had no side effects.

I can't be sure of course that it was the statins that caused the Cholesterol/HDL ratio reduction. Changes in my diet and / or exercise in the last year might have helped too.


Before I took Statins (3/1/13)



1 Year after taking Statins (21/3/14)






What's your QRISK?

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Lipid Modification - NICE draft guidelines 2014

reposted from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=folder&o=66546

Consultation documents

The full version describes the evidence and views that have been considered, and sets out the provisional recommendations that have been developed. My recommended read.
The NICE version presents the provisional recommendations only with some brief supporting information. My recommended read.
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.

Statins aren't a wonder drug

reposted from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/23/statins-not-wonder-drug-major-diseases?commentpage=2
crabsallover highlightskey pointscomments / links.


Calculate risk of having a heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years - use QRISK2

It takes seconds to calculate your risk: http://www.qrisk.org

New draft NICE guidelines may be ratified July 2014 recommending use of Statins if your risk of having a heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years is 10% (cf. currently 20%).

See the great interactive 'how statins work'. viz

  1. Cholesterol is produced mainly in the liver. There is good cholesterol and bad cholesterol. Too much bad, LDL-cholesterol, however, can cause hardening of the arteries. 
  2. The liver contains an enzyme called HMG-CoA reductase, which produces cholesterol ...
  3. Statins replace the HMG-CoA that exists in the liver, thereby slowing down the cholesterol production process ...
  4. The 'inhibition' of HMG-CoA enzyme by the statin has other effects, on top of reducing the amount of cholesterol produced. It also increases the production of LDL receptors, proteins which 'catch' the bad cholesterol and draw it into the liver cells to be broken down.
Modified by Chris Street from Guardian Feb 2014 http: //goo.gl/DRAo2R

Whilst NICE and Rory Collins are recommending use of Statins with 10% 10 year risk of heart attack or stroke, John Abramson, a clinician working at Harvard medical school claims his BMJ published analysis showed statins did not significantly reduce mortality in the 20% or 10% risk groups. (Guardian Feb 2014).